Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460T is 1733 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-950 - 234 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-950 - $48.75 vs $83.31
- Up to 42% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-950 - $0.21 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FPS
229
97.86324786324786%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, $
$83.31
58%
Buy for $83.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |