Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4865 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $100.0 vs $272.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13600K - $0.86 vs $1.81 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 30% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-950 - 151 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
47%
Price, $
$272.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |