Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2991 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $100.0 vs $819.3
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-950 - 109 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 32 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77052 minutes ago
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Single-Core
463
39.53885567890691%
Multi-Core
1569
20.811778750497414%
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |