Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 4216 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-940XM - 204 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
