Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 3677 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i7-940XM - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 32 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1299.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarksfield | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |