Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 4034 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-930
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $144.95 vs $229.99
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-11900F - $1.27 vs $1.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-930 - 146 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-930 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-930 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
FPS
114
78.08219178082192%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $144.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
80.37974683544303%
Price, $
$229.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Single-Core
416
19.16167664670659%
Multi-Core
1424
15.527205321120924%
Intel Core i7-930 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |