Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2741 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-930
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-930 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-930 - $109.99 vs $148.73
- Up to 32% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-930 - $0.92 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-930 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $148.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 28th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-930 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 28th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |