Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 4248 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 40% better in Rust than Core i7-920XM - 214 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-920XM - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-920XM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
