Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8809G outperforms Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8809G is 2271 days newer than Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8809G
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3960X - 174 vs 157 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8809G - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
157
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $295.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8809G | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |