Buy on Amazon
$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 2410 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-880 - 221 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $69.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i7-880 - $0.31 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
214
96.83257918552036%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
59.61538461538461%
Price, $
$112
61%
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1651 minutes ago
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
221
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1656 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
46.846846846846844%
Multi-Core
1653
53.738621586475944%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
