Buy on Amazon
$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 224 days older than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 1% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-2400S - 98 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $59.99 vs $112.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-880 - $0.62 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
54.385964912280706%
Price, $
$112
53%
FPS Winner
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1925 minutes ago
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
97
98.9795918367347%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1925 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
496
95.38461538461539%
Multi-Core
1352
81.79068360556563%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
