Buy on Amazon
$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-880 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-880 is 224 days older than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Performs up to 0% better in Valorant than Core i5-2300 - 689 vs 688 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $45.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-880 - $0.07 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
689
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
43.75000000000001%
Price, $
$112
40%
FPS Winner
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3711 minutes ago
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
688
99.85486211901306%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2300 2.80GHz Quad-Core Desktop Processor
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3711 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
510
98.07692307692307%
Multi-Core
1490
90.13914095583787%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
