Buy on Amazon
$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $112.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i5-11600 - $0.69 vs $0.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-880 - 179 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 12 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
163
91.06145251396647%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor Intel Core i7-880 i7 880 3.067 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2356 minutes ago
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
88.46153846153845%
Price, $
$140
80%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-880
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
24.50518378887842%
Multi-Core
1653
20.18808011724475%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
