Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2865 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 7% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-880 - 105 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-880 - $53.55 vs $112.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-880 - $0.51 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-880 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-880 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
98
93.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
44.736842105263165%
Price, $
$112
47%
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1811 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$53.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1818 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |