Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3943 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-875K - 163 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $85.13 vs $180.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-875K - $0.52 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8838 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8838 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |