Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms Core i7-8705G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 1823 days newer than Core i7-8705G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-8705G - 150 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8705G - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8705G | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |