Buy on Amazon
$255
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 454 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - 274 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $63.92 vs $255.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-8700T - $0.25 vs $0.93 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
256
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
