Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 602 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-8700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $298.95 vs $1244.02
- Up to 74% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.55 vs $2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-8700T - 591 vs 548 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 48 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
548
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
591
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
26%
Price, $
$1244.02
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,244.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |