Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 765 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 54% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 389 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $39.9 vs $186.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-8700K - $0.16 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
252
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |