Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1767 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 89% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610 - 174 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $37.0 vs $186.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-8700K - $0.4 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |