Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700B outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700B is 1303 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700B
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700B - 24 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-8700B
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700B | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
