Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700B outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700B is 1352 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700B
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-4160T - 574 vs 501 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700B - 35 vs 65 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-8700B
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700B | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
