Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $48.0 vs $440.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $0.29 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1402 minutes ago
Buy for $440 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |