Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $48.0 vs $85.13
- Up to 37% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - $0.44 vs $0.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-860 - 122 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12341 minutes ago
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |