Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Core i7-840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3978 days newer than Core i7-840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 58% better in War Thunder than Core i7-840QM - 201 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-840QM - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-840QM doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-840QM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-840QM | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
