Buy on Amazon
$449
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1394 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Core i3-4130T - 178 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7 i7-7820X Octa-core 8 Core 3.60 GHz Processor Socket R4 LGA-2066
Buy for $449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
909
64.42239546420979%
Multi-Core
1811
23.073002930309595%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
