Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 66 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $109.99 vs $495.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-7820X - $0.67 vs $2.96 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
164
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |