Buy on Amazon
$244.85
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $378
Availability
MSRP in USD: $378
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $242
Availability
MSRP in USD: $242
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 2192 days newer than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-13500 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 63% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-7820HQ - 237 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HQ - 20 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-13500 Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820HQ
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-7820HQ or Core i5-13500
FIFA 23, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
108 FPS
$8.06/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-13500
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$869.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
