Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 275 days newer than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-7820HQ - 134 vs 133 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2507 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820HQ | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |