Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820HK outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820HK is 825 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HK
- Performs up to 12% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 56 vs 50 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820HK - 15 vs 45 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7820HK
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Single-Core
866
67.39299610894942%
Multi-Core
2541
61.96049743964886%
Intel Core i7-7820HK | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
