Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7740X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7740X is 1666 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7740X
- Performs up to 22% better in New World than Celeron G1610 - 120 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-7740X - $37.0 vs $155.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing New World than Core i7-7740X - $0.38 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i7-7740X - 55 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7740X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
29.457364341085267%
Price, $
$155
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1890 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
81.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1887 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.070991432068542%
Multi-Core
739
14.004169035436801%
Intel Core i7-7740X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
112 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
43.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |