Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-7700T vs Core i9-10900X

Core i7-7700T vs Core i9-10900X: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-7700T

2.9 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-7700T Logo
Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB

Buy for $150 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8561 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900X

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)

Buy for $615 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8561 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-7700T

2.9 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-7700T Logo
Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB

Buy for $150 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8561 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900X

3.7 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)

Buy for $615 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8561 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1019 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T

  • Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $150.0 vs $615.0
  • Up to 75% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-10900X - $0.82 vs $3.32 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X

  • Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-7700T - 185 vs 183 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 20 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Stray.
Stray

Stray

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i7-7700T Logo
Core i7-7700T

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


FPS

183

98%

Value, $/FPS

$0.82/FPS

100%

Price, $

$150

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB

Buy for $150 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8561 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019


FPS

185

100%

Value, $/FPS

$3.32/FPS

24%

Price, $

$615

24%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)

Buy for $615 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 8561 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i7-7700T Logo
Core i7-7700T

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-7700T Logo
Core i7-7700T

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


Single-Core

1222

77%

Multi-Core

3728

39%

Intel Core i9-10900X Logo
Core i9-10900X

Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019


Single-Core

1576

100%

Multi-Core

9371

100%

Intel Core i7-7700T Logo

Intel Core i7-7700T

vs
Intel Core i9-10900X Logo

Intel Core i9-10900X

Jan 3rd, 2017Release Date
Oct 19th, 2019
Core i7CollectionCore i9 Extreme
Kaby LakeCodenameCascade Lake
Intel Socket 1151SocketIntel Socket 2066
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
10
8Threads
20
2.9 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.5 GHz
35 W
TDP165 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
29.0xMultiplier
37.0x
HD 630
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Core i7-7700T or Core i9-10900X

Stray, 1920 x 1080, High

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.