Buy on Amazon
$150
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than FX-8150 - 159 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $82.02 vs $150.0
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 1 MB
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76346 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 FX8150 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8150FRW8KGU FD8150FRGUBOX 8MB
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-7700T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-7700T or FX-8150
Halo Infinite, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
26 FPS
$34.58/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i7-7700T
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
26 FPS
$34.58/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Core i7-7700T
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$899
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
