Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Remnant II than FX-6100 - 86 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $29.65 vs $150.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-7700T - $0.38 vs $1.74 per FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
21.839080459770116%
Price, $
$150
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
78
90.69767441860465%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |