Buy on Amazon
$235
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 219 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 725 vs 705 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $168.76 vs $235.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-7700K - $0.24 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Intel Core i7-7700K Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.5 GHz Unlocked LGA 1151 100/200 Series 91W
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
705
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$168.76
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $168.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-7700K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
