Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 912 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1820 - 160 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $46.41 vs $499.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-6950X - $0.32 vs $3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9769 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
144
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9768 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |