Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $115.0 vs $488.22
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900 - $0.86 vs $3.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6850K - 147 vs 134 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6850K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6850K doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
134
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Buy for $488.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6850K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |