Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1731 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 11% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G540 - 138 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $19.25 vs $103.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Watch Dogs: Legion than Core i7-6800K - $0.16 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
124
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |