Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1316 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 187 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than FX-8350 - $103.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Rust than FX-8350 - $0.55 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |