Buy on Amazon
$103
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $434
Availability
MSRP in USD: $434
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1128 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6350 - 129 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6350 - $0.8 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $100.0 vs $103.0
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Boxed Core i7-6800K Processor (15M Cache, up to 3.60 GHz) FCLGA2011-3 (BX80671I76800K)
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
