Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1128 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $89.08 vs $750.0
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $89.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76346 minutes ago
Buy for $750 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76346 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
92.85714285714286%
Multi-Core
3566
47.84008585994097%
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |