Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 79 days older than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 198 vs 191 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 80 vs 91 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 80 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |