Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 521 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930 - 108 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $63.92 vs $180.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-6700K - $0.69 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 51 vs 91 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
93
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |