Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 31 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 35% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3900 - 184 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $39.9 vs $180.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-6700K - $0.29 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 51 vs 91 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7748 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
136
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |