Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700K is 740 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 14% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 120 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $180.0 vs $221.76
- Up to 29% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.5 vs $2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 91 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 32 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$180
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
105
87%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
71%
Price, $
$221.76
81%
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |