Buy on Amazon
$180
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 1069 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4130 - 189 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $22.92 vs $180.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6700K - $0.14 vs $0.95 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700K
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
