Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2896 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-640M - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1075
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |