Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 989 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-640M - 210 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |