Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4086 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 25 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-640LM - 235 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $165.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |