Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1068NG7 is 3493 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-620M - 134 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i7-620M - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-620M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
